Start Submission Become a Reviewer

Reading: The Truth of Wikipedia


A- A+
Alt. Display


The Truth of Wikipedia


Nathaniel Tkacz

The University of Warwick (UK)
X close


What does it mean to assert that Wikipedia has a relation to truth? That there is, despite regular claims to the contrary, an entire apparatus of truth in Wikipedia? In this article, I show that Wikipedia has in fact two distinct relations to truth: one which is well known and forms the basis of existing popular and scholarly commentaries, and another which refers to equally well-known aspects of Wikipedia, but has not been understood in terms of truth. I demonstrate Wikipedia's dual relation to truth through a close analysis of the Neutral Point of View core content policy (and one of the project's 'Five Pillars'). I conclude by indicating what is at stake in the assertion that Wikipedia has a regime of truth and what bearing this has on existing commentaries.

How to Cite: Tkacz, N., 2012. The Truth of Wikipedia. Digithum, (14). DOI:
Published on 31 May 2012.
Peer Reviewed


  • PDF (CA)

  • PDF (EN)

  • ePUB (CA)

  • ePUB (EN)

    comments powered by Disqus